Skip to content

No Reparations UK

  • HISTORYExpand
    • The history they don’t tell you
    • Britain’s role: the full picture
  • WHO PAYS?Expand
    • Who pays? The racial levy problem
    • Narrowing the pool
    • The double liability problem
    • The Windrush dimension
  • THE LAWExpand
    • The legal case that doesn’t exist
    • The government’s weak position
  • CARICOMExpand
    • CARICOM and the ten-point plan
    • Does the money even work?
    • What would actually be fair?
  • SOURCESExpand
    • Sources and further reading
No Reparations UK
Home/The legal case that doesn’t exist/State succession and continuity doctrine/What international law actually says
In this section
  • The legal case that doesn’t exist
  • State succession and continuity doctrine
    • What international law actually says
    • Why modern Britain is not the same legal entity
    • Precedents and how they don't apply
  • The legality principle
  • Jurisdiction: no court can hear this
  • Limitation periods
  • The 1833 compensation payment
The legal case that doesn’t exist

What international law actually says

NextWhy modern Britain is not the same legal entity

© 2026 No Reparations UK - WordPress Theme by Kadence WP

  • HISTORY
    • The history they don’t tell you
    • Britain’s role: the full picture
  • WHO PAYS?
    • Who pays? The racial levy problem
    • Narrowing the pool
    • The double liability problem
    • The Windrush dimension
  • THE LAW
    • The legal case that doesn’t exist
    • The government’s weak position
  • CARICOM
    • CARICOM and the ten-point plan
    • Does the money even work?
    • What would actually be fair?
  • SOURCES
    • Sources and further reading