Skip to content

No Reparations UK

  • HISTORYExpand
    • The history they don’t tell you
    • Britain’s role: the full picture
  • WHO PAYS?Expand
    • Who pays? The racial levy problem
    • Narrowing the pool
    • The double liability problem
    • The Windrush dimension
  • THE LAWExpand
    • The legal case that doesn’t exist
    • The government’s weak position
  • CARICOMExpand
    • CARICOM and the ten-point plan
    • Does the money even work?
    • What would actually be fair?
  • SOURCESExpand
    • Sources and further reading
No Reparations UK
Home/Does the money even work?/Evidence from existing reparations schemes/What made those schemes different from what is proposed here
In this section
  • Does the money even work?
  • Evidence from existing reparations schemes
    • German Holocaust reparations: why this is a valid precedent
    • US Japanese internment payments: conditions that made it work
    • What made those schemes different from what is proposed here
    • Cases where reparations payments did not produce lasting change
  • The empire built on slavery claim
  • Caribbean governance and development failure
  • What actually addresses structural inequality
  • The accountability gap
Does the money even work?

What made those schemes different from what is proposed here

PreviousUS Japanese internment payments: conditions that made it workNextCases where reparations payments did not produce lasting change

© 2026 No Reparations UK - WordPress Theme by Kadence WP

  • HISTORY
    • The history they don’t tell you
    • Britain’s role: the full picture
  • WHO PAYS?
    • Who pays? The racial levy problem
    • Narrowing the pool
    • The double liability problem
    • The Windrush dimension
  • THE LAW
    • The legal case that doesn’t exist
    • The government’s weak position
  • CARICOM
    • CARICOM and the ten-point plan
    • Does the money even work?
    • What would actually be fair?
  • SOURCES
    • Sources and further reading